The Life of an Online Image

In the very first post that I wrote, I talked about how photo databases create an open door for stealing photos for use on other websites. I decided to a little searching on other blogs to see if anyone else had discussed this topic. Amy Stein, a photographer, posted in July about this exact topic. 

In her post, Stein talked about how, as artists, it is their choice if they decide to put their photographs on the computer and that it is highly likely that they will be re-posted in other places on the internet. She states that she is not against her photos being posted on the Internet in other websites as long as she is credited the picture. 

The "Road Hog" Bus 1968 -Lisa Law
re-post #80

I was interested in seeing how much pictures are re-posted on the Internet, so I found a website called tineye.com. Basically, this website is an image search engine that finds everywhere and image has been posted. I decided to test out this website by logging onto my Pinterest account and choosing an image on one of my boards. I then copied the URL of the image and pasted it into the search engine. After a couple minutes of searching, the website told me that the picture had been re-posted seventy-nine times over the internet. When I "re-pinned" this picture to my Pinterest board, I had no idea who the photographer was; it had been copied and pasted so much that it had lost the attribution to the photographer by the time I came across the picture. If it wasn't for the sake of this post, I wouldn't have gone on a search to find the photographer, but after a few Google searches, I came across Lisa Law. A photographer in the 1960's Lisa took this photo entitled The "Road Hog" Bus at the 1968 Fourth of July parade in El Rito, New Mexico (http://americanhistory.si.edu/lisalaw/1.htm). 

I guess this post goes to show that how we as the "re-posters"  need to credit every photo that we use. If we don't start this practice in our lives, seventy-nine re-posts later, we will never know who took the really awesome hippie bus picture. 

Beyonce's "Inspirations" Being Questioned

Today, I ran across an article on the New York Times web site discussing plagiarism found in Beyonce's music videos.

According to the article, Beyonce's video "Countdown", takes dance moves as well as backdrop and style ideas from Belgian choreographer, Anne Teresa De Keersmaeker. Keersmaeker says that she admires Beyonce's dancing and artistic abilities, but found it rude not to recognize where the ideas came from. 


Beyonce's reply to these allegations was that she found Keersmaeker along with others (60's and 70's famous people) as inspirations for this video.  


If we break this article up by viewing the claims, grounds, and warrants of the Toulmin Model, we will see that the claim is directed to the plagiarism found in Beyonce's music video. This claim was brought to the light by Keersmaeker. To support or give grounds to this claim, the article touched on the reader's/veiwer's sensory details by incorporating a video that shows the scenes that matched from Beyonce's video to the dance moves choreographed by Keersmaeker. The article also gave an ethos reasoning by quoting Keersmaeker in the article.


The warrant in this article was obvious with the focus on plagiarism. The word plagiarism has been drilled into our heads since we started writing papers in grade school. In other words, the article reaches our moral values. We know it is wrong to plagiarize, therefore we think that Beyonce has some people that she needs to give credit to in the making of her music video. 

Are We Following a Theme?

Twilight, the book that stole the hearts of many high schoolers, later becoming a movie sensation, has created quite an influence in today's media.

Vampires have always been popular characters in stories for many years, but I feel like it has more recently become more common in all forms of media; television, movie theaters, and books.

Is that gray line between plagiarism and inspiration becoming more socially acceptable? From Twilight to True Blood and Moonlight, these vampire stories have similar outlines that create the story. However, we know that they are not exactly the same, removing the proposition of the stories being clearly plagiarized.

Not only is the use of vampires being overused, but the remakes of superhero movies and other remakes are being created. Is this a new idea or just another form of inspirational plagiarism?

Is our culture being so handicapped with the use of the Internet that we forget to find new and creative ideas?

What Do Others Say About Plagiarism?

So this week I wanted to dive into the idea of plagiarism once again. I know that I have been writing about it for the past few weeks, but I feel like I could never really find a line that is created between plagiarism and creativity. 


I came upon a blog post from viget.com entitled Consumption: How Inspiration Killed, Then Ate, Creativity. The writer talks about how as children, we are subject to an intense amount of "inspiration". 

"The misinterpretation of inspiration is bred into our culture. In school we are taught by the examples of others, given information to digest and remember, instead of being handed problems to analyze and interpret on our own. As children we are taught to fear failure and to learn from the mistakes of others instead of experiencing them first hand. Many times curriculums centered around creativity and exploration are pushed out of the way to make room for ones rooted in practical application and applied theory.."

The author wants us to redefine the word "inspiration". Our culture is supposedly rewording this word in many ways. 


In Naldz Graphics, Drawing the Line - Inspiration or Plagiarism the writer discusses how the things around the world are "copied" from nature.

"Things around us are actually copied. The idea of airplanes came from birds. Most of the stuff around us is created through a study of nature. Up to this day, it is a common knowledge that the idea of airplanes was coined from birds. The birds still have the credit. People are not originalist, we are enhancers and developers. That is what Picasso meant by saying good artists copy."

Both of these blogs point out the fact that we are constantly immersed in possible inspirations. However, Viget completely disagrees in using the so called "inspirations" that we have today. Instead, we should be more focused on what it means to be purely creative without being dependent on the visuals around us. Naldz wants the reader to know that even the "Greats" had forms of inspiration that sparked an idea for their creative masterpieces. 


Between these two blogs, it is clear to see the bias over the blog by Viget due to the blogger's career in writing and other creative outlets. Otherwise, both posts stood as informative forms of sharing to others. 


So where do you stand? Is inspiration good, or are we killing our creativity by taking inspiration from around us?


I encourage you to read the two posts that I have linked to this post. They are very informative and shine a new light on this topic that I have been writing about in my posts.